Pick the rescue path
Use Technical Discovery first when risk is unclear; use cleanup or stabilization when the app and scope are bounded enough.
Cleanup and stabilization for existing apps that need safer releases, better structure, logging, dependency checks, or targeted fixes.
Starting options
These are the concrete ways this service usually starts. The fit call confirms the smallest responsible option.
Stability report, production-grade cleanup, refactor, logging/error handling improvements, and prioritized roadmap.
Deeper rescue package with audit, cleanup, targeted fixes, monitoring/dependency work, sign-off, and one month Care.
How it works
Use Technical Discovery first when risk is unclear; use cleanup or stabilization when the app and scope are bounded enough.
Clean structure, errors, dependencies, logging, deployment, and known production risks according to the selected scope.
Use included fix time only where the selected package allows it, then quote larger requests clearly.
Deliver sign-off evidence, known limitations, next-step roadmap, and Care or another support recommendation where appropriate.
Practical public material to help you evaluate the starting point before a call.
Start with Technical Discovery if the app is unclear or risky. Move to rescue/stabilization when the problem and production path are scoped enough to fix responsibly.
No. Cleanup and stabilization improve the existing app. A rebuild is a separate decision if the report shows the current foundation is not worth rescuing.
The app can move into Care, Launch Partner, Growth, Code Ownership/self-hosting, or a documented support pause depending on who will operate it.
Bring the current failure points and production constraints. PiFlow will confirm whether cleanup, stabilization, or diagnosis should come first.